Thanks to the machine, human society will be born with a class that has never appeared in history and is useless to both the economy and the military - abbreviated as the useless class. They will be immersed in the comfort of virtual reality, and they will die and die in the stimulation of the electrodes like experimental mice. Today, it seems that the Nordic countries have well assumed the great role of the "social system experimental field." A piece of news from Finland is ignorable in the tech news of CES. The Finnish government randomly selected 2,000 people from unemployment benefits or subsidies. In the two years from January 1 this year, They will be given 560 euros (about 4077 yuan) for each person. The money does not have to pay taxes and will not affect any of the remaining benefits. 
They can stay home and rely on the 560 euro to save their food - the Finnish government said that if the experiment works well, it will consider expanding the audience to all Finnish adults. This also made Finland the first country in Europe to try the universal basic income system (the Swiss government proposed the bill before, but was rejected in the referendum), that is, it receives a monthly subscription to maintain a minimum living standard. The subsidies are not conditional on any form of work or other social contribution. Lazy people's paradise and the gospel? Of course you can say this, after all, the teachings of former President Roosevelt of the United States are still in the ears: "No country, no matter how wealthy, can afford to waste human resources." But this is more like the valuable evidence of humanity in the industrial era - cut through the value of the aura At the end of reality, the important reason why liberalism has become the main ideology of developed countries in Europe and America is that the human resources that have taken the lead in industrialized countries deserve even more cherish. But nowadays, the argument that artificial intelligence replaces the work of human beings is nothing new. What makes the conservatives feel embarrassed is that if there is bound to be a large area of ​​unemployment in the future, then a “welfare society†will be unavoidable. Just a few decades after Roosevelt made the above remarks, another US President Barack Obama said in an interview with Joe Yito, director of the MIT media lab and Scott Datiqi, chief editor of Connected: “Whether the unified distribution of income is correct or not will be widely accepted by the public and will become a topic of debate in the next decade or two.†Compared to the period when time is given to society, the development of technology seems to be too fast. As one of the helmsman of this wave of science and technology, Elon Musk has a cold understanding of the coming of the welfare society. In his view, “Because of the development of automation technology, we are likely to get a unified basic. Income, or a similar income model. I'm not sure what people will do, but I think this will eventually become a reality.†Economists calculate the government’s basic subsidy payments based on the ratio of taxes to GDP. Amount: According to an article in The Economist, the U.S. government's monthly basic income for each person should be 525 U.S. dollars, and China's figures for 2015 should be about 108 U.S. dollars. Officials in charge of social welfare in Finland stated that the general basic income is to eliminate the "unfavorable factors" of the unemployed and reduce their fear of "losing something" - but this is more of a comfort to a small number of desolate elements. In the eyes of many serious scholars: In the future, perhaps only the "rich" are qualified to work ("The more wealthy the more busy, the more busy the more money," the signs of increasing returns have already been revealed). For most people, the world itself is a prison without a high wall. It depends on the government's fixed monthly captivity; the added value that work gives mankind - a sense of honor, responsibility, diligence, and collaboration, will no longer exist. They will be immersed in the comfort of virtual reality and will die and die in the stimulation of the electrodes like experimental mice. So, will the future "welfare system" be so unbearable? The harbinger of a welfare society Let's look at reality first. Using the United States as an example, from the data, the macroeconomic boom has not improved the lives of most families. Since 1980, the median household income in the United States has even declined slightly. This means that in the past few decades, only rich people have been the gift of technological progress and globalization. In his column, Wan Wei just described the observation made by an American scholar that, presumably, science and technology have led to a continuous decrease in the overall number of jobs. There is no need for rumors. The key is the last two points: First, the US unemployment rate is now about 6%, but the problem is that Many are not “good jobsâ€. A quarter of “working†adults’ income is even lower than the poverty line. Second, even more shocking is that the United States is already a welfare state. Since 1959, the United States has experienced the highest growth rate. The fast type of income is government transfer payments, and 20% of the total household income is government transfer payments. Without this transfer payment, half of the working Americans will fall into poverty. When many people are still whispering complaints about the technology's stealing of "bad jobs," they have further demonstrated their ambitious plans and devoured the work of the middle class. For example, a Japanese insurance company recently replaced 34 life insurance claims workers with Watson Explorer from 2017. As Harvard Business Review stated, artificial intelligence such as Watson is expected to improve knowledge-based. Professionals, such as insurance and finance, because many jobs can “consist of work that can be incorporated into standard steps and decisions that are based on fully formatted data.†In the eyes of some sociologists, the biggest squeeze of artificial intelligence on society is as The backbone of the middle class was hollowed out. They longed for social stability, mastered a great deal of professional knowledge, and engaged in the “slow system†work of the brain – and this is where artificial intelligence is best, as Hawking writes in a column in The Guardian. : “Factory automation has caused many traditional manufacturing workers to become unemployed. The rise of artificial intelligence is likely to cause the tide of unemployment to spread to the middle class. In the end, it will only leave care for people, create and supervise work.†And in the future, who can To be sure, the machine will not be good at nursing, creating and supervising work? Captive life In fact, after the industrial revolution, the intellectual elite had several times misunderstood the relationship between machines and work (such as the industrial population's large-scale substitution of the agricultural population), and thus optimistically concise the following “consensusâ€: Old and low After the replacement of skilled work, new and high-skilled jobs will burst out. This is the footnote of human progress. Regrettably, although it has boosted morale, it is not Newton's law, nor is it a natural choice. Herald, author of A Brief History of the Future, believes that thanks to the machine, human society will be born with a history that never emerged. A class that is useless to both the economy and the military - abbreviated as the useless class. It is precisely for this reason that the story of “the technology that first benefited some people will benefit everyone†will not be repeated, and Hilary cited an unpleasant example: “The reason why medical treatment It is because everyone is worthwhile.†Well, social inequality has long been a corner between science and technology, economics, and humanities. It is almost certain that the tearing trend of human social classes is irreversible. This anxiety is one of the biggest reasons for the rise of right-wing forces and populism. The irreversible social tears will eventually be realized by most people. How can we maintain social stability? The future has come - captive Finland's universal basic income system may be replicated to the world, and the United States will also be, in the logic of a chaotic cruiser article: "The Democrats' approach is to force employers to act for most people with no value. Paying wages, using tax revenues to increase spending power for people who are not working, creating some strange service demand out of thin air, and then exporting surpluses in production capacity by exploiting the international market. Since such actions do not encourage progress in production, The Democrats then used public spending on science and education to promote the development of technology and used loose monetary policies to force capital input into production. In general, it was all about promoting technology and capital to divide the middle class, with some up, most down, and then the bottom. People use welfare to grow up and look forward to their warmth and waning.†Of course, the reason why people are dying may be to thank technology. As the "Matrix" described: Two pills are placed in front of them, red, live in the real world; blue, happy in the virtual world. In the future, useless people, most of us on the planet, may be relieved by pills and virtual reality technology. Ray Kurzweil once predicted: The future of nano-robots may interact freely with brain neurons, completely constructing a perfect virtual reality experience, so that individuals have a sense of God's general existence. So are you ready?
They can stay home and rely on the 560 euro to save their food - the Finnish government said that if the experiment works well, it will consider expanding the audience to all Finnish adults. This also made Finland the first country in Europe to try the universal basic income system (the Swiss government proposed the bill before, but was rejected in the referendum), that is, it receives a monthly subscription to maintain a minimum living standard. The subsidies are not conditional on any form of work or other social contribution. Lazy people's paradise and the gospel? Of course you can say this, after all, the teachings of former President Roosevelt of the United States are still in the ears: "No country, no matter how wealthy, can afford to waste human resources." But this is more like the valuable evidence of humanity in the industrial era - cut through the value of the aura At the end of reality, the important reason why liberalism has become the main ideology of developed countries in Europe and America is that the human resources that have taken the lead in industrialized countries deserve even more cherish. But nowadays, the argument that artificial intelligence replaces the work of human beings is nothing new. What makes the conservatives feel embarrassed is that if there is bound to be a large area of ​​unemployment in the future, then a “welfare society†will be unavoidable. Just a few decades after Roosevelt made the above remarks, another US President Barack Obama said in an interview with Joe Yito, director of the MIT media lab and Scott Datiqi, chief editor of Connected: “Whether the unified distribution of income is correct or not will be widely accepted by the public and will become a topic of debate in the next decade or two.†Compared to the period when time is given to society, the development of technology seems to be too fast. As one of the helmsman of this wave of science and technology, Elon Musk has a cold understanding of the coming of the welfare society. In his view, “Because of the development of automation technology, we are likely to get a unified basic. Income, or a similar income model. I'm not sure what people will do, but I think this will eventually become a reality.†Economists calculate the government’s basic subsidy payments based on the ratio of taxes to GDP. Amount: According to an article in The Economist, the U.S. government's monthly basic income for each person should be 525 U.S. dollars, and China's figures for 2015 should be about 108 U.S. dollars. Officials in charge of social welfare in Finland stated that the general basic income is to eliminate the "unfavorable factors" of the unemployed and reduce their fear of "losing something" - but this is more of a comfort to a small number of desolate elements. In the eyes of many serious scholars: In the future, perhaps only the "rich" are qualified to work ("The more wealthy the more busy, the more busy the more money," the signs of increasing returns have already been revealed). For most people, the world itself is a prison without a high wall. It depends on the government's fixed monthly captivity; the added value that work gives mankind - a sense of honor, responsibility, diligence, and collaboration, will no longer exist. They will be immersed in the comfort of virtual reality and will die and die in the stimulation of the electrodes like experimental mice. So, will the future "welfare system" be so unbearable? The harbinger of a welfare society Let's look at reality first. Using the United States as an example, from the data, the macroeconomic boom has not improved the lives of most families. Since 1980, the median household income in the United States has even declined slightly. This means that in the past few decades, only rich people have been the gift of technological progress and globalization. In his column, Wan Wei just described the observation made by an American scholar that, presumably, science and technology have led to a continuous decrease in the overall number of jobs. There is no need for rumors. The key is the last two points: First, the US unemployment rate is now about 6%, but the problem is that Many are not “good jobsâ€. A quarter of “working†adults’ income is even lower than the poverty line. Second, even more shocking is that the United States is already a welfare state. Since 1959, the United States has experienced the highest growth rate. The fast type of income is government transfer payments, and 20% of the total household income is government transfer payments. Without this transfer payment, half of the working Americans will fall into poverty. When many people are still whispering complaints about the technology's stealing of "bad jobs," they have further demonstrated their ambitious plans and devoured the work of the middle class. For example, a Japanese insurance company recently replaced 34 life insurance claims workers with Watson Explorer from 2017. As Harvard Business Review stated, artificial intelligence such as Watson is expected to improve knowledge-based. Professionals, such as insurance and finance, because many jobs can “consist of work that can be incorporated into standard steps and decisions that are based on fully formatted data.†In the eyes of some sociologists, the biggest squeeze of artificial intelligence on society is as The backbone of the middle class was hollowed out. They longed for social stability, mastered a great deal of professional knowledge, and engaged in the “slow system†work of the brain – and this is where artificial intelligence is best, as Hawking writes in a column in The Guardian. : “Factory automation has caused many traditional manufacturing workers to become unemployed. The rise of artificial intelligence is likely to cause the tide of unemployment to spread to the middle class. In the end, it will only leave care for people, create and supervise work.†And in the future, who can To be sure, the machine will not be good at nursing, creating and supervising work? Captive life In fact, after the industrial revolution, the intellectual elite had several times misunderstood the relationship between machines and work (such as the industrial population's large-scale substitution of the agricultural population), and thus optimistically concise the following “consensusâ€: Old and low After the replacement of skilled work, new and high-skilled jobs will burst out. This is the footnote of human progress. Regrettably, although it has boosted morale, it is not Newton's law, nor is it a natural choice. Herald, author of A Brief History of the Future, believes that thanks to the machine, human society will be born with a history that never emerged. A class that is useless to both the economy and the military - abbreviated as the useless class. It is precisely for this reason that the story of “the technology that first benefited some people will benefit everyone†will not be repeated, and Hilary cited an unpleasant example: “The reason why medical treatment It is because everyone is worthwhile.†Well, social inequality has long been a corner between science and technology, economics, and humanities. It is almost certain that the tearing trend of human social classes is irreversible. This anxiety is one of the biggest reasons for the rise of right-wing forces and populism. The irreversible social tears will eventually be realized by most people. How can we maintain social stability? The future has come - captive Finland's universal basic income system may be replicated to the world, and the United States will also be, in the logic of a chaotic cruiser article: "The Democrats' approach is to force employers to act for most people with no value. Paying wages, using tax revenues to increase spending power for people who are not working, creating some strange service demand out of thin air, and then exporting surpluses in production capacity by exploiting the international market. Since such actions do not encourage progress in production, The Democrats then used public spending on science and education to promote the development of technology and used loose monetary policies to force capital input into production. In general, it was all about promoting technology and capital to divide the middle class, with some up, most down, and then the bottom. People use welfare to grow up and look forward to their warmth and waning.†Of course, the reason why people are dying may be to thank technology. As the "Matrix" described: Two pills are placed in front of them, red, live in the real world; blue, happy in the virtual world. In the future, useless people, most of us on the planet, may be relieved by pills and virtual reality technology. Ray Kurzweil once predicted: The future of nano-robots may interact freely with brain neurons, completely constructing a perfect virtual reality experience, so that individuals have a sense of God's general existence. So are you ready?
Current transducer,Fluxgate current sensor,Current sensor,High precision current sensor
Shanghai Zhilong Electronic Technology Co.,Ltd , https://www.zhilongsensor.com